Skip to content.

TalkBMC

Sections
You are here: Home » Blogs » whurley (William Hurley) » opensville » The Bugatti Principle

The Bugatti Principle The Bugatti Principle

Document Actions

Recently Gartner warned of the open source threat to the Big Four systems management vendors, but I don’t think the current open source solutions are quite ready to take on the big four yet. Systems management just isn't easy. People tend to treat it like electricity and only realize its value when the power is out, but behind the scenes enormous complexity is battled in an effort to keep the lights on.

Most entrants are going to lose the battle of scale. Scale seems like such a simple issue. Say you’ve got 150 Linux boxes you're monitoring. Whenever you need to you can just add another 150 boxes to double the capacity, right? You and I know that’s ludicrous. But since this is a hotly debated topic, and since scale can be hard to visualize, let’s use a simple analogy we can all get behind: a fast car.

The Bugatti Veyron is the world's fastest production car. With a top speed of 253 mph, the Veyron is a marvel of modern engineering. Engineering it, however, was no small feat. The engineers ran into incredible problems with scale. First, they approached the BMW Sauber F1 Team and asked to use their wind tunnel: “Ooh, sorry. Love to help you, but our wind tunnel doesn’t actually go that fast.”

Great. No wind tunnel. Fine, we’ll work on that. Let’s build the car as if we had all the equipment we needed and hash out the details later. Now let’s talk horsepower. To get from 0 to 150 mph takes a mere 191 horsepower. Not too tough to manage—several production pickup trucks can boast that many horses. But to get from 150 to 250 mph (the Veyron's top speed) takes an additional 800 horses! How do you harness that kind of power and fit it all into a single automobile?

Remember our 150 servers? To double our capacity we can't just add another 150 servers. We have to consider power consumption, back up procedures, monitoring, manpower, etc. Just like our new beefed-up server room, the Veyron generates tons of heat. Your car has one radiator; the Veyron has 10. Maybe some of Bugatti’s engineers would be interested in a data center consulting gig . . .

Say we’ve overcome all our obstacles and got our car (server room) built. Now it’s time to test it. A car that goes 253 mph needs a huge space for testing. The engineers at Bugatti allowed a 3rd party to verify the top speed on a 5.5 mile track in Germany. A track so long that if you stand at one end, you cannot see the other because of the curvature of the earth. Now you need gasoline . . . of some sort. At top speed the Veyron—making a whopping 7 mpg—runs out of gas in only 12 minutes. Which is actually a good thing, because the tires would burst in only 15.

What does all this have to do with the little four taking on the Big Four, you ask? Because the little four still have to go from 150 to 253 mph; they aren’t finished growing from small business to enterprise scale. It's easy to say things like “Enterprise Grade” and “Enterprise Ready.” It’s hard to deliver true enterprise solutions. I love open source systems management. In fact I helped start the movement. But we're already seeing some of the big boys start to build strong open source strategies, and I have a feeling we'll see the first of many open source management moves from at least one of them soon. If I were Gartner I wouldn't count one of the Big Four out just yet.




<< Observations from OSBC | Slashdot It! | The Death Of A Software License >>

Add to Technorati Favorites

_____
tags:
Wednesday, May 30, 2007  |  Permalink |  Comments (10)

and how does BMC fit in?

Posted by andy at 2007-05-30 02:28
Your posts contain some really cool thoughts about the industry and open source, still looking forward to some specifics about BMC plans and approaches,

thanks.

The Bugatti Principal or the reality real world systems managemen

Posted by Brady Davis at 2007-05-30 20:28
Whurley,
Great article. A real eye opener.

Scalability Reality

Posted by Joe at 2007-05-30 21:23
Its interesting that scalability was brought up in relation to...Linux. Well. I look at a computer such as SGI's Altix 4000 (here: http://www.sgi.com/products/servers/altix/4000/). It supports up to 512 processors under one instance of Linux and as much as 128TB of globally shared memory, and Petabytes of disk storage (kind of like 512 servers all at once). The alternatives listed? Not on this machine? How about the computers at top500.org. The current list of the 500 fastest supercomputers in the world. The database that lists operating systems is here: http://www.top500.org/stats/28/osfam/. Tens of thousands of processors (all at one go). Is that what was meant by scalability? What about the Department of Homeland Securities use of Linux, or the US Navy, Air Force, NSA, NASA, etc. How about the big Hollywood studios? Is that what is meant by 'scalability'? Please please let me know if you want links. I have oodles of them.

automobiles vs. software

Posted by Mike Malone at 2007-05-30 21:36
So you've watched Top Gear's speed test of the Bugatti Veyron. What's that got to do with software? Scaling a software system doesn't have to be difficult, if it's managed properly. MySQL does it; Linux does it; Apache, PHP, squid, lighttpd, and hundreds of other applications are open source _and_ enterprise level. Why not one more? The Veyron is unique, after all. What these software packages are doing is quite conventional by comparison.

The little four

Posted by John at 2007-07-06 00:03
The thing is I keep hearing about how the Big4 is commited to Open Source, however, I never hear them mention the little 4 by name. IBM, HP, BMC all will talk about OSS in terms of Apache, JBOSS, MySQL. However, If I do a search of Nagios on the BMC Web site I get no hits for Nagios. IMHO, the only thing that is going to stop the Little 4 is when one of them is purchased by a big 4'er and then there will be a feeding frenzy.

It's not the scale where the smaller survives, but how quickly they find their niche.

Posted by Aaron Manley Smith at 2008-01-22 04:18
Sounds like some one watched their Top Gear and Mr. May make his run last year :)

What's impressive is that the bar has been raised in the supercar arena because of the Veyron.

The gauntlet has been thrown and here's what's coming after the Veyron:

1. Brabus has released the TKR which sells for 1/3 of the Veyron's 1.5 mil tag and it will go 270 mph. (price 500,000)

2. Saleen S7 Twin Turbo - Top Speed 248 mph (price $585,000)

3. SSC Ultimate Aero TT -- 1200hp – Top Speed 256mph (price $650,000)

4. Koenigsegg is actually bringing in a “green car” with its 1018bhp CCXR, top speed 248 mph (price $800,000)

5. In 2009 Porsche is set to release its 950hp GT1 supercar which they have deemed "A Veyron Killer".

This is just the short list . . .there are other cars available today that reach similar limits and have on track performance beyond the Veyron for less than half of the Veyron's 1.5 mil sticker.(Ascari A10, Caparo T1)

I can see the parallels that you’re trying to draw into your industry . . . .

Saying that it’s very hard for a smaller company to compete on scale with a larger company is true, but I’m not sure the performance of supercars is a strong tie to this.

Here’s why:

The one big thing to note is that one of the “BIG FOUR” of the Auto Manufacturers actually makes the Veyron (VW AG), but it’s actually the smaller firms that have already surpassed the Veyron in its performance and it took less than a year for this to happen.

Anyhow, I’m delighted that you have an interest in cars . . . they are one of my passions and I can’t pretend to know about management systems – this is your forte, I know.

As for the auto market, it’s not really performance where the smaller companies will survive: it’s distribution, production, logistics, and branding – and this is where the smaller companies get choked out from competing with the automotive “BIG FOUR.”
(i.e., GM, FORD, TOYOTA, VW)

For smaller companies to survive in this market, they must cater to a niche crowd.

BMW and Porsche are great examples of smaller auto manufacturers who found a niche, stayed true to it.

Ok, it’s late . . . and I have the auctions tomorrow.

Nice post, by the way, it was very educational.

Have a good night.


It's not the scale where the smaller survives, but how quickly they find their niche.

Posted by Aaron at 2008-01-22 04:25

Sounds like some one watched their Top Gear and Mr. May make his run last year :)

What's impressive is that the bar has been raised in the supercar arena because of the Veyron.

The gauntlet has been thrown and here's what's coming after the Veyron:

1. Brabus has released the TKR which sells for 1/3 of the Veyron's 1.5 mil tag and it will go 270 mph. (price 500,000)

2. Saleen S7 Twin Turbo - Top Speed 248 mph (price $585,000)

3. SSC Ultimate Aero TT -- 1200hp – Top Speed 256mph (price $650,000)

4. Koenigsegg is actually bringing in a “green car” with its 1018bhp CCXR, top speed 248 mph (price $800,000)

5. In 2009 Porsche is set to release its 950hp GT1 supercar which they have deemed "A Veyron Killer".

This is just the short list . . .there are other cars available today that reach similar limits and have on track performance beyond the Veyron for less than half of the Veyron's 1.5 mil sticker.(Ascari A10, Caparo T1)

I can see the parallels that you’re trying to draw into your industry . . . .

Saying that it’s very hard for a smaller company to compete on scale with a larger company is true, but I’m not sure the performance of supercars is a strong tie to this.

Here’s why:

The one big thing to note is that one of the “BIG FOUR” of the Auto Manufacturers actually makes the Veyron (VW AG), but it’s actually the smaller firms that have already surpassed the Veyron in its performance and it took less than a year for this to happen.

Anyhow, I’m delighted that you have an interest in cars . . . they are one of my passions and I can’t pretend to know about management systems – this is your forte, I know.

As for the auto market, it’s not really performance where the smaller companies will survive: it’s distribution, production, logistics, and branding – and this is where the smaller companies get choked out from competing with the automotive “BIG FOUR.”
(i.e., GM, FORD, TOYOTA, VW)

For smaller companies to survive in this market, they must cater to a niche crowd.

BMW and Porsche are great examples of smaller auto manufacturers who found a niche, stayed true to it.

Ok, it’s late . . . and I have the auctions tomorrow.

Nice post, by the way, it was very educational.

Have a good night.

Aaron




Veyron

Posted by Emilio at 2008-07-31 14:32
2002 HP BUGATTI VEYRON.

NOW JUST SMILE :)
whurley (William Hurley)

Subscribe to whurley's blog Subscribe to whurley's blog

Bio and Published Works

View blog authority
Email Alert: whurley's Blog

Get an email alert when I publish a new blog entry! Enter your email address:

 

Powered by Plone

This site conforms to the following standards: