Hey HP, where's your software business? Oh, wait, I found it.
When I read the title of Carter Lusher's (director of the HP's Corporate Analyst Relations team) Monday blog post, I wished I'd come up with it myself: "How serious is HP about software?" Then I actually read the post, and it did a better job of making my case than I ever could. Check this excerpt:
In a recent meeting, while discussing HP's financial strength with a major customer's IT executives, I got a question/comment from the CIO. He stopped me, pointed to the thin slice of the earnings pie that is HP Software and asked "How serious is HP about software? That seems like an awfully small piece of your business." Yep, the slice that is HP Software (capital S) in our Q3 earnings is relatively tiny, 2 percent, but it only reflects the tip of the HP software (lowercase s) efforts.
So what you’re saying, Carter, is what we’ve been thinking for years: software isn’t important at HP. Maybe it’s by choice. Maybe software just isn’t one of your core competencies. Either way, I’d like to offer you this tidbit. If you’re a multi-billion dollar computer company, and software only accounts for 2% of your business (yes, I saw your “accounting issue” spin, good times), then what you really need is the proper visual to demonstrate your company’s commitment to software when speaking to analysts and members of the press. In the interest of coop-tition, here are some royalty-free graphics you can use in your next presentation:

Wow. Making 2 percent appear as visually important as Carter made it sound with his smooth fingers was harder than I thought. Still, I think these will spice up HP’s next earnings call and really hammer the message home, don’t you?
HP, You're On Notice | Slashdot It! | BarCampESM Wrap Up
_____
tags:
and...
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=HPQ puts them @ 104.29 Billion in revenue.
So...they're still half a billion more at 2 percent. And BMC is 100% software. So does that mean BMC is just doing a horrible job? Ultimately these are just numbers. HP, similar to other large companies doesn't have singular focus on software...because they'd rather deliver a total solution to customers. Similar things could be said about IBM, Sun, etc.
The point of your rant is?
6 Billion just in the last year
Be careful what you wish for...
Charting HP Software Business
Nice job taking my post out of context
BTW, I can't seem to find a link to the original HP AR post in your post (maybe you did not want people to see how you artfully twisted the content) so here it is:
http://www.communities.hp.com/online/blogs/analystrelations/archive/2007/10/22/HPPost4816.aspx
Carter Lusher
SageCircle
www.sagecircle.wordpress.com
Hey HP where is your software business
Do yourself a favour, it is better you be thought a fool than write soething down and prove it.
Really the problem with Blogs and the web is anyone thinks they can write and have a valued opinion, they can't.
Your litte comment here is white noise the size of a pimple on the bum of a small animal on our a planet. Small in comparison to real comment, analysis and truthful reporting.
Get a life and who ever you are related to at BMC I would counsel them to distance themselves from you. I mean really how do you think in "the court of public opinion" would anyone even listen let alone believe you.

But, perhaps you could be more explicit about your point?
You're suggesting that since HP is really an ink company, and that the software product business is a small portion of the revenue that something - unknown - will change? What?
IBM is now, in the majority, a consulting company. You're not really suggesting that they cannot also produce computers or software are you?
HP is an ink company. They also sell computers. And software.
So what?